Mar 27, 2017
Misinformation on charter public school performance is circulating in abundance in the Missouri legislature and on social media. Illogical data comparisons are being made and charter public schools are being unfairly portrayed.
To accurately analyze charter public school performance, data must be compared “apples-to-apples.” In the case of St. Louis and Kansas City, charters should be compared in performance to their non-selective counterparts. For St. Louis this means comparing charters to St. Louis Public Schools (SLPS) excluding magnet schools and for Kansas City Public Schools (KCPS) excluding their signature schools. Unlike charter schools, magnet and signature schools require students to test-in, show high grades on transcripts, show little to no history of behavior problems and in some cases require a rigorous interview process and portfolio submission.
The schools that are required to accept all students are the traditional KCPS and SLPS schools and all charter public schools in each of the two cities. There are no selective charter schools in the entire country.
In order to compare student achievement, CEAM has put together four PDFs comparing charter public schools’ math and reading scores to those of traditional public schools.