Message: Revised slides

Revised slides
FromNeale, ChrisDate  Tuesday, September 12, 2017 7:08 AM
To
Wieberg, Jackie;Rush, Brenda
Cc
Dorsey, Casey
SubjectRevised slides

Jackie and Brenda,

 

The attached presentations are for use today. I cleaned them up early this morning.

 

Thank you,

 

Chris

 

Chris Neale, Ed. D.

Assistant Commissioner

Office of Quality Schools

PO Box 480

Jefferson City, MO 65102-0480

573-751-4234 (v)

573-751-9434 (f)

dese.mo.gov/quality-schools

 


MSIP Advisory Committee

Missouri Department 
of Elementary and Secondary Education

Algebra I and English II

SEPTEMBER 2017

      Type comments here.

1




Situational Framework

2



APR impact

3



Calculation Impact

Impacted

Not Impacted

4



Statewide MPI Impact

ContentMinimumMaximum3 yr Avg
ELA0-6.3-2.1
Mathematics0-5.5-1.8

5



LEAs Gaining, Neutral and Losing

Content% Lost% Neutral or Gained
English language arts75%25%
Mathematics60%40%

6



Status Solutions Considered

7



Hold Harmless

8



Status Target Adjustment

9



Status Target Adjustment - ELA

 FloorApproachingOn-Track2020 Target
2017100.0-299.9300.0-370.2370.2-385.6385.7-500.0
Jamtgaard100.0-297.8297.9-368.0368.1-383.5383.6-500.0
Max. Stability100.0-292.0292.1-366.8366.9-382.7382.8-500.0

10



Status Target Adjustment – Math

 FloorApproachingOn-Track2020 Target
2017100.0-299.9300.0-366.6366.7-392.7392.8-500.0
Jamtgaard100.0-298.1298.2-364.8364.9-390.9391.0-500.0
Max. Stability100.0-294.5294.6-360.1360.2-388.6388.7-500.0

11



Status Target Analysis

Advantages

Disadvantages

12



MPI Adjustment

Area3 yr. Avg. EOC EffectLoss Reciprocal
S1 ELA.98121.0192
S2 ELA.97901.0214
S1 Math.98961.0105
S2 Math.98991.0102

13



MPI Adjustment Applied

AreaExisting MPILoss ReciprocalAdjusted MPI
S1 ELA330.91.0157336.1
S2 ELA319.61.0176325.2
S1 Math336.61.0097339.9
S2 Math324.31.0093327.3

14



Methods of MPI Adjustment

Remove EOCs (2015-2017)

3 yr. Avg. Raw MPI

Multiply by Reciprocal

Adjusted MPI

15

2017 MPI x Reciprocal

Avg 2015, 2016, Adj 2017

Adjusted MPI



MPI Adjustment Examples

 201520162017
S1 Math MPI (w/o, w/o, w/o)330.6321.2308.2
S1 Math MPI (w/, w/, w/o)337.0331.2308.2

16

Method 1: (Remove EOCs across 3 years)

3 yr avg x Reciprocal = Adjusted MPI

320.0x 1.0105 = 323.36

Method 2: (Adjust 2017 only)

Average of (2015, 2016, Adjusted 2017)

(337.0 + 331.2 + (308.2*1.0105)) = 326.5



Loss Reciprocal Appeals Projected

Content / StandardLoss ReciprocalApplied to Avg.Applied to 2017
ELA S11.019294
ELA S21.0124196
Mathematics S11.0105114
Mathematics S21.010281

17



Progress Calculation

18



High School Readiness

 LEAsProf./Adv. StudentsTotal StudentsProf./Adv. on Algebra I onlyProf./Adv. on any other EOCTotal Prof./Adv.
201580538197813.4%13.8%27.2%
201684651209012.7%18.4%31.1%
201785664217510.7%19.8%30.5%

19



High School Readiness

20



HSR: Status solutions considered

21



HSR: Status solutions considered

22


MSIP 6 
Phase I wrap UP

Missouri Department 
of Elementary and Secondary Education

September 2017

      Type comments here.

1




Educational Policy Alignment

Federal

State

Local

2



Proper Perspective

Policy Drivers

Every Student succeeds Act

Every Student succeeds Act

Every Student succeeds ActPolicy Drivers

Every Student succeeds Act

Every Student succeeds Act

Every Student succeeds Act

MSIP

ESSA

CSIP

Every Student succeeds Act

Every Student succeeds Act

Every Student succeeds Act

MSIP

ESSA

CSIP

3



MSIP Policy Goals

and Districts

4



MSIP 6

5

MSIP 6 is an iteration that began in 1990.

Many states use only ESEA for improvement

Resource only to broad to performance and back

MASA – Effective Schools research

DESE strategic plan

Engaged in Standard and Indicator writing

1/6/2011

2




Current Realities

Preferred Future

Gaps

Preferred Future Model



Working Toward the Preferred Future

MSIP 5

MSIP 6

MSIP 7

MSIP 8

7



Desirable Outcomes for MSIP 6

8



Desirable Outcomes for MSIP 6

9



10

Career Education

Diversity

Standards

3




DRAFT

Performance measures

11

Continue to wrestle with EL issue – be specific

4




DRAFT

Process Measures

12



DRAFT

Process Measures

13



DRAFT

Process Measures

14



DRAFT

Process Measures

15



Performance Measures

 GeneralAcademicsCo-curricular and LeadershipCareer and Citizenship
Kindergarten    
Middle    
High    
Post-secondary    

16

Success-Ready Graduates

Readiness Indicators



Emergent Themes

17

I’d like to share a bit about the recommendations in general

Don’t get hung up on measurement

5




What is next

18



That’s why!

Get out your phones . . .

19



Chris.Neale@dese.mo.gov

dese.mo.gov/Quality-Schools

Questions?

20